Home

Some companies that have chosen us

Privacy Officer and Privacy Consultant
CDP Scheme according to ISO/IEC 17024:2012
European Privacy Auditor
ISDP©10003 Certification Scheme according to ISO/IEC 17065:2012
Auditor
According to standard UNI 11697:2017
Lead Auditor ISO/IEC 27001:2022
According to standard ISO/IEC 17024:2012
Data Protection Officer
According to standard ISO/IEC 17024:2012
Anti-Bribery Lead Auditor Expert
According to standard ISO/IEC 17024:2012
ICT Security Manager
According to standard UNI 11506:2017
IT Service Management (ITSM)
According to the ITIL Foundation
Ethical Hacker (CEH)
According to the EC-Council
Network Defender (CND)
According to the EC-Council
Computer Hacking Forensics Investigator (CHFI)
According to the EC-Council
Penetration Testing Professional (CPENT)
According to the EC-Council

Professional qualifications

Stay up-to-date with world news!

Select your topics of interest:

News

Home / News
/
CHEZ SUPERVISORY AUTHORITY: From January, UOOU managed more than hundred of personal data security breaches.

CHEZ SUPERVISORY AUTHORITY: From January, UOOU managed more than hundred of personal data security breaches.

9 June 2020 – During the period from January to May of this year, the Data Protection Office has received more that 100 personal data breach cases, the so called data breach. The subject that were affected by this security accident came from financial areas and banks, education, health and PA, mostly municipalities.
A serious and frequent reason for the report was a phishing attack to an informatic system. This event also regarded the medical structures (see recent cases in Bohemian and Moravian hospitals).

Less serious accidents included, for example, a report on a high school boy who improperly obtained and used his teacher’s access data and subsequently modified some frequency data and results.

A significant number of security breaches have been caused since insufficient instruction and poor training of people, which causes errors, such as reckless email management, make data available or allow a system breach (phishing attack).

From this relationship it is clear that the processors of personal data do not systematically cooperate with the security and protection of personal data and do not pay attention to the information of appropriate password. It also reveals the level of security of access to internal systems in a very irregular way. Respect for data protection principles is not sufficient. While the security of internet communication should be evaluated separately (many administrators do not appreciate that, in compliance with Article 24 of the GDPR, the https protocol is considered standard protection, not just an http connection).

A positive trend is that the media has taken steps to prevent and remedy accidents and their side effects in all justified cases. The Office stresses that the remedy is not only the elimination of the defect condition, but also the definition of more effective future measures and the possible mitigation of staff training on the security of personal data.

With regard to requests from processors to assess whether disciplinary procedures are appropriate with an employee who has an impact on the breach of personal data, the Office stresses that this is not part of its work. The processor in general, not every employee, is always responsible for the correct processing of personal data in accordance with the law.

In most cases, the Office has assessed the nature and modalities for resolving accidents and measures taken on the basis of notifications sent (or additional information requested by the Office) as sufficient without the need to exercise surveillance powers.

SOURCE: AUTORITA’ PER LA PROTEZIONE DEI DATI DELLA REPUBBLICA CECA

Recommended to you

Advanced Research